In Kraidy's article,
"Globalization of culture through media (2002)", he explored the
global media debate between 'cultural imperialism' and 'globalization'. Kraidy
disagreed that audiences especially from developing countries are passive
importers and receivers of values, information and products from Western
culture. He evaluated and analyzed cultural imperialism and explained how it
evolved with the influence of media into 'globalization' and 'hybridization'. Instead
of a homogenizing process, he considered cultural globalization as
hybridization where different cultures globally transform and adapt to satisfy
their local needs while retaining aspects of their traditional culture.
Kraidy mentions
that one party of the debate regarding the ‘relationship between media and the
globalization of culture’ perceives that “mass media trigger[ed] and create[ed]
the globalization of culture”.
I personally feel that the claim is too
generalized and fails to take into consideration the other driving factors of cultural globalization that precedes the advent of mass media.
Therefore, I believe that the phenomenon of globalization of culture is already
prevalent in the past, long before the introduction of mass media.
The advancement of technology and progression into the
digital age has invariably increased the speed of culture globalization. Ashdown
stated that “Because of the internet”, “Everything is connected to everything
[in our modern world]” making nations and people ‘interdependent’ and
‘interlocked’ (Ashdown, 2011). This progression is evident in our everyday
life, such as television channels and online news portals supplying news from
all over the world to our intimate spaces. Social media platforms increased
interconnectivity of people and allowed them to adapt and gain knowledge of
different cultures. Mass media truly transforms our cultural experiences in
unprecedented ways.
Media is
an indisputable force of the globalization of culture, but I would
not label it as the sole trigger. The era of the steamboat began in 1787 and
bullet train transportation was
invented in the early 1960s, such transportation advancements led to increased
in the movement of people and migration. These are integral factors of cultural
globalization as “new technologies of transport allow frequent
and multi-directional flows of people, ideas and cultural symbols” (Castles,
2006). Looking beyond the
influences of mass media, I consider advances in transportation, migration as early engines of cultural globalization
that assisted the assimilation of different culture by various groups of people
and generation of cultural activities. Therefore, I do not agree that mass
media should be solely culpable for cultural globalization even though it has
indeed quickened and escalated the whole process.
(400 words)
References:
Stephen Castles (23 FEB 2006). Migration and Community Formation under Conditions of
Globalization.
Paddy Ashdown (Jan 2012). The global power shift.
http://www.ted.com/talks/paddy_ashdown_the_global_power_shift.html
source=facebook#.Uvj0BmChr9I.facebook
Kraidy, M. M. (2002). Globalization of Culture Through the Media. Retrieved from
http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1333&context=asc_papers
No comments:
Post a Comment